Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aharonz1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/5/0). Withdrawn by WJBscribe @ 13:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination
[edit]Aharonz1 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Aharonz1 (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Anti-Vandal work; Wikipedia deserves it :)
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I really liked it when I undid vandalism on a page AND posted a warning on the vandals talk page. OK, so I was not logged in when I did that but still it was me :)
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: No.
General comments
[edit]- Links for Aharonz1: Aharonz1 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Aharonz1 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- Obvious Oppose Wikipedia:Not now would solve your queries. Soham 12:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTNOW. You can do anti-vandalism work without being an admin. That needs lots of experience over a broad range of areas. --Stfg (talk) 12:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Not ready yet, sorry. GiantSnowman 13:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it would be best if this was quickly closed per Not Now. The candidate has far to few edits to even gain useful feedback from this RFA. Sorry. Pedro : Chat 13:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose as per WP:NOTNOW. I don't know if Aharonz1 is just joking; he should know that his RfA will get closed rather quickly as with the earlier case with Ængiølå's RfA due to lack of experience and far few edits. I should not elaborate further but we need to close this one early. Japanese Rail Fan (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.